论我国劳动合同法“服务期条款”之局限性及完善  

On Limitation and Improvement of the Terms in Service Period of China's Labor Contract Law

作　　者：王勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西警官职业学院,陕西西安710043

出　　处：《广西警察学院学报》2017年第1期19-22,共4页Journal of Guangxi Police College

摘　　要：我国劳动合同法立法角度是倾向于保护劳动者的,即使是在平衡劳资双方权利的"服务期条款"上,法律依旧对用人单位给予诸多限制。在法律主体、培训利益和违约救济等内容上存在的立法局限性,使服务期条款不能适应劳动力市场的发展变化。应从明确非培训性利益、建立违约惩罚机制、制定服务期上限等方面来修订我国劳动合同法中的服务期条款。Legislation of China＇s Labor Contract Law p rones to protection of the laborers. There are numerous restrictions on employers even in the terms in service period,which balance the rights of both laborers and management. Legal subject,training interests and remedies for breach of contract witnesses legislative limitation, making the service terms inconsistent with the development of the labor markets. Therefore, the terms in service period of China＇s Labor Contract Law need to be revised through clear specification of non-training benefits, establishment of mechanism for the default penalty, and development of upper limit of service period.

关 键 词：倾斜性保护 服务期条款 培训费用 培训期限 违约金 

分 类 号：G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]