治安调解视野下警察自由裁量权控制  

On the Police Discretionary Power control:A Perspective of Public Security Mediation

作　　者：张永林[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西警官职业学院,陕西西安710021

出　　处：《广西警察学院学报》2017年第1期62-67,共6页Journal of Guangxi Police College

摘　　要：治安调解处理案件时除纠纷双方自愿选择外,应以"因民间纠纷引起""情节较轻"为必要条件。治安调解工作效果的实现离不开警察自由裁量权的运用,但囿于治安调解工作本身所具有的复杂性、功利性与特殊性,难免与警察自由裁量权的实际需求存在矛盾。另外,自由裁量权在权力运用方面具有扩张可能性,需要通过治安调解工作立法、提升公安民警工作能力与素养、加强对自由裁量权的法律监督等措施予以规制。In the settlement of cases through public security mediation, civil disputes-caused cases and relatively minor circumstances should be taken as the essential conditions except for voluntary choices made by both parties concerned. Effective public security mediation can not be separated from application of the police discretionary power. confined to complexity, utilitarian and particularity on the part of public security mediation, there inevitably exist Contradictions between public security mediation and the actual needs of the police discretionary power. In addition, due to the potential extension of the police discretionary power in power application, it need to be regulated through public security mediation legislation, improvement of the police service ability and quality, intensifegication of legal supervision of discretionary power.

关 键 词：治安调解 民间纠纷 自由裁量权 规制措施 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]