检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡伟涛[1]
出 处:《矿山测量》2017年第5期97-100,共4页Mine Surveying
摘 要:文中针对目前地下管线探测的难点问题之一(近间距平行地下管线),首先介绍了直连法、压线法及夹钳法三种方法,接着通过三种模型讨论了管线定位、定深的效果。最后给出结论:直连法与夹钳法是管线探测的首选方法,然后可以考虑倾斜压线法或水平压线法;在管线定深中,70%法测量精度高于直读法。Aiming at one of the difficult problem of underground pipeline detection ( near distance between parallelunderground pipeline), first, charging method and clamp me t h o d and induction me t h o d were introduced,and thenthrough thethreekinds of model theeffects of thepipelinelocation, depth were discussed. T h e conclusion was giv-en :charging method and clamp me t h o d were the first choice me t h o d for pipeline detection, and then the tilt line orlevel line method were considered; In the pipeline d e p t h, the m e a s u rement accuracy of 706 w a s higher than the di-rect reading metliod.
分 类 号:P631.3[天文地球—地质矿产勘探]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30