我国民事法律中的“修理、重作、更换”  

On“Repairing,Remaking,Replacing”in the Civil Law of China

作　　者：肖国忠 

机构地区：[1]全国哲学社会科学规划办公室基金管理处

出　　处：《华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第5期110-117,共8页Journal of South China Normal University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：我国现行民事法律中将"修理、重作、更换"定性为一种民事责任的承担方式,存在谬误。"修理、重作、更换"不是一个法律概念,其不具备法律概念应有的特性,也无法发挥法律概念的功能;"修理、重作、更换"不是一种独立的请求权,它已被其他请求权所涵盖。"修理、重作、更换"不具有民事责任的强制性。根据民法典总则"提取公因式"原理,民法典应废弃现行民事立法将"修理、重作、更换"作为一种民事责任承担方式的做法。In the current civil law of China,there is a wrong tendency that'repairing,remaking,replacing'is regarded as a way to assume liability. 'Repairing,remaking,replacing'is not a legal concept,not having the characteristics of legal concept,nor being able to play the function of legal concept.'Repairing,remaking,replacing'is not an independent claim,and it has been covered by other claims.'Repairing,remaking,replacing'does not have the characteristic of compulsion of civil liability. According to the principle of'extracting the common factor'in the Civil Code,we should abolish the provision of the existing civil legislation which takes'repairing,remaking,replacing'as a means of civil liability.

关 键 词：修理 重作 更换 民法典总则 请求权 

分 类 号：D923.1[政治法律—民商法学]