改进的p指数测度单篇论文学术质量的探讨  

Discussion of Improved p-index Evaluating the Academic Quality of Single Paper

作　　者：刘运梅[1] 李长玲[1] 冯志刚[1] 刘小慧[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学科技信息研究所,淄博255049

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2017年第21期106-113,共8页Library and Information Service

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"基于量化与质性数据的跨学科合作行为研究"(项目编号:16BTQ078)研究成果之一

摘　　要：[目的 /意义]继承p指数的思想,提出基于引证文献的单篇论文评价指标p_q指数、基于参考文献和引证文献的综合性单篇论文评价指标p_c指数,以综合评价单篇论文的学术质量。[方法 /过程]选择图书情报学2013年的载文做样本数据,对p_q指数、p_c指数进行验证。[结果 /结论]发现在测度单篇论文学术质量时,p_q指数不仅继承了h指数、学术迹基于引证文献评价单篇论文的优势,而且分别在数值区分度、计算过程复杂度方面优于h指数和学术迹。p_c指数将单篇论文的引证文献、参考文献综合在一个评价体系中,不仅具有p_q指数、h指数、学术迹的性能,而且为单篇论文评价方法提供了一个全新的视角,具有全面反映学术论文内容质量和学术影响力的综合优势。[ Purpose/significance ] In order to comprehensively evaluate the academic quality of single paper, this paper inherits the idea of p-index, and puts forward the pq-index of single paper based on the citation literature, and the Pc -index of single paper based on the reference literature and citation literature. [ Method/process ] Taking the published paper data of 2013 in the field of library and information science as an example, this paper verified the evaluation effect of pq-index and Pc-index＂ [ Result/conclusion] It is found that in the measurement of the academic quality of single paper, the pq-index not only inherits the advantage of h-index and the academic trace, but also superior to h-index and the aca- demic trace in terms of numerical differentiation and computational complexity. The Pc-index also combines the reference literature and citation literature in a rating system. It not only has the performance of pq-index, h-index, the academic trace, but also provides a new perspective for single paper evaluation methods, which has a comprehensive advantage of e- valuating the content quality and the academic influence of academic papers.

关 键 词：P指数 单篇论文评价 pq指数 pc指数 h指数学术迹 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]