马克思主义辩证法的两种面向——奥尔曼与阿多诺辩证法思想之比较  

Two Facets of Marxist Dialectics——Comparison of Ollman's and Adorno's Dialectic Thoughts

作　　者：黄亚明[1] 侯振武 HUANG Ya-ming HOU Zhen-wu(School of Philosophy, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China School of Philosophy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Core Socialist Values, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350 [2]北京师范大学哲学学院社会主义核心价值观协同创新中心,北京100875

出　　处：《内蒙古大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第5期38-42,共5页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目(项目批准号:16ZDA097);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(项目批准号:2016M591110)

摘　　要：就思想来源而言,奥尔曼主要是以分析马克思的辩证法来提出自己的观点,阿多诺的思想来源既包括马克思,也包括德国古典哲学及卢卡奇等。就运思进路而言,奥尔曼更多地继承了马克思政治经济学的批判进路,以"内在关系"作为辩证法的核心概念,阿多诺辩证法的核心是"否定",他接受的是前期马克思的异化理论。就理论归宿而言,奥尔曼为未来社会作了辩护论证,阿多诺则只是提出了一个以"星丛"概念为核心的"和解"框架。二者之间的种种差异并不足以说明奥尔曼对阿多诺的超越,相反,二者是应当相互补益的。In terms of the source of their thoughts, Ollman puts forward his views mainly through analysis of Marx＇s dialectics while Adorno＇s develops his thought from Marx, classical German philosophy and Lukacs, etc. In terms of logical path, Ollman inherits Marx＇s critical path of political economy and uses ＂ internal relation＂ as the core concept of dialectics ; in con- trast, the core of Adorno＇s dialectics is ＂negation＂ and what he accepts is Marx＇s early theory of alienation. In terms of the desti- nation of theory, Ollman discusses and defends the future society while Adorno puts forward a ＂ reconciliation＂ framework with concept of ＂constellation＂ at the core. Their differences are not big enough to indicate that Ollman is superior to Adorno but on the contrary, they are complementary to each other.

关 键 词：奥尔曼 阿多诺 辩证法 

分 类 号：B089.1[哲学宗教—哲学理论]