也论法律的法规创造力原则  

Also on the Principle of Legal Norms-Creating Force of Law

作　　者：黄宇骁 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《中外法学》2017年第5期1327-1350,共24页Peking University Law Journal

摘　　要：二战前的德国将迈耶的法律保留原则与拉班德的双重法律概念理论混同在一起处理立法权的权限分配问题。"法律的法规创造力"这一迈耶行政法首要原则在魏玛共和国时期被忽视,从行政法教义学体系中消失。战后日本学界围绕法律的法规创造力的原意及其与法律保留的关系产生了论争。通过分析可以发现,法律的法规创造力是一种关于法律效力的判断原则,它与双重法律概念理论并不相同。同时,在法律的法规创造力原则没有确立的情况下,谈论法律保留原则是没有意义的。学说和概念的彻底梳理有着正本清源的意义。我国学界应借鉴这些重要思想,抛弃使用概念混乱的法律保留原则,并在否定行政规范性文件普遍约束力的基础上构建自己的三层级公法授权规则。Before the Second World War, Germany confused the theory of double concepts of law ad vocated by Paul Laband with the principle of reservation of law advocated by Otto Mayer, and dealt with the distribution of legislative powers. The ＂legal norms--creating force of law＂, the most important prin ciple of Mayer＇s administrative law, was neglected in the Republic of Weimar and disappeared from the system of administrative law dogmatic. After the Second World War, Japanese academic circles had de- bates about the original intention of the principle of legal norms--creating force of law and its relation with the principle of reservation of law. It is found through analyzing that the principle of legal norms-- creating force of law is a judgment principle about legal effect, and it is not the same as the theory of double concepts of law. At the same time, it is meaningless for us to discuss the principle of reservation of law in the event where the principle of legal norms creating force of law has not been established. A complete combing through the theories and concepts bears the significance of clarifying matters and get ting to the bottom of things. Our academic circles should draw on those important thoughts, abandon the principle of legal reservation which has a confusing concept, and construct our own three--level authori zation rule of public law on the basis of denying the general binding force of administrative normative doc-

关 键 词：法律的法规创造力 双重法律概念 法规 法律保留 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]