中间人截贿构成侵占罪的法理分析  

Jurisprudential Analysis on the Crime of Embezzlement Due to the Middlemen's Behavior of Intercepting Bribes

作　　者：张天虹[1] 张瑶 

机构地区：[1]山西大学法学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《山西高等学校社会科学学报》2017年第10期38-42,55,共6页Social Sciences Journal of Universities in Shanxi

摘　　要：贿赂犯罪中,行贿人委托中间人转交行贿款的行为是基于不法原因的委托行为;中间人占有的行为是否构成侵占罪,在理论界有否定说、肯定说和两分说。区分不法原因给付和不法原因委托的两分说,不仅有利于维护法秩序的统一性,兼顾刑法的补充性和谦抑性,而且有利于保护"委托信任关系"这一法益和预防类似犯罪。对截留的款物是否属于"他人的财物"的判断,对于认定截贿行为是否侵占罪也具有重要价值。截贿行为的定性是一个思维方式问题,应根据刑法分则规定的犯罪构成,结合截贿行为在接受委托及其后的具体行为表现以及犯意产生的时间、主观的犯罪目的等因素,进行综合判断。In bribery crimes, the act that the briber entrusts the middleman to transfer bribes is the act of commis- sion based on illegal causes; with regard to whether the act of the middleman who has secretly possessed a part of bribes could constitute the crime of embezzlement, there exist such views as affirmative view, negative view and view of dichotomy in academe, and the view of dichotomy which distinguishes the payment and commission of illegal reasons is conducive not only to maintaining the unity of the law order, with consideration of the supplementary and modest nature of criminal law, but also to protecting this legal interests of the ＂trust relationship＂ and preventing similar crimes ; it is also of great value to determine whether the act of intercepting the bribes could constitute the crime of embezzlement and whether the intercepted bribes shall belong to the ＂other＇s property＂. The qualitative characterization of the act of intercepting the bribes is a way of thinking, and we shall make a comprehensive judgment, according to the constitution of the crime defined in specific provisions of Criminal Law, and combining with the specific behavior which the middleman has done after he accepted the commission, and the time of criminal intent . the subiective purpose of the crime and other factors.

关 键 词：截贿 不法委托 侵占罪 

分 类 号：D924.392[政治法律—刑法学]