检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐思慧[1,2]
机构地区:[1]湘潭大学公共管理学院 [2]"法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心"
出 处:《知识产权》2017年第10期109-116,共8页Intellectual Property
摘 要:大数据时代,文本和数据挖掘技术的广泛应用打破版权法构建的利益平衡机制,给我国著作权法带来了挑战,亟需调整。美国的应对是从默示许可转到无条件例外规则,而欧盟《DSM版权指令》提案以义务式的模式规定了"科学研究领域的文本和数据挖掘"例外规则,对科研促进及对版权保护力度适中,值得借鉴。我国著作权法修改应制定"文本和数据挖掘合理使用规则",严格限制适用条件,重构利益平衡机制。In the era of big data, the extensive application of text and data mining technology breaks the interest balance mechanism created by copyright law, which brings challenges to the copyright law of China and calls for urgent adjustment. The United States changes the implied license to the unconditional exception rules, while the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Copyright in the Digital Single Market proposes an obligation model to specify "the exception rules of text and data mining in the field of scientific research." It is worthwhile to draw attention to the promotion of scientific research and the moderate copyright protection. The revision of the Copyright Law in China should formulate the rules for the rational use of text and data mining, strictly restrict the applicable conditions and reconstruct the interests balance mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145