PM_(2.5)测试方法对比及其燃煤电厂的排放特征分析  

Constrast of PM_(2.5) test methods and emissions characterization research for coal-fired power plant

作　　者：刘含笑 姚宇平 郦建国 丁红蕾 常倩云 左朋莱[4] LIU Hartxiao;YA;LI Jianguo;DING Honglei;CHANG Qianyun;ZUO Penglai(Zhejiang Feida Environmental Science ＆ Technology Co., Ltd., Zhuji 311800, China;College of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric power, Shanghai 200090, China;State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;Beijing Municipal Institute of Labour Protection, Beijing 10054, China)

机构地区：[1]浙江菲达环保科技股份有限公司,浙江诸暨311800 [2]上海电力学院能源与机械工程学院,上海200090 [3]浙江大学能源清洁利用国家重点实验室,浙江杭州310027 [4]北京市劳动保护科学研究所,北京100054

出　　处：《中国粉体技术》2017年第5期43-48,共6页China Powder Science and Technology

基　　金：国家重点研发计划项目;编号:2016YFC0203704;2016YFC0209107

摘　　要：遵循电力行业标准DL/T 1520—2016,采用PM-10撞击器(30 L/min)、质量法撞击器(DGI,70 L/min)、静电低压撞击器(ELPI,10 L/min)对燃煤电厂的PM_(2.5)进行现场对比测试;并对燃煤电厂PM_(2.5)排放特征进行总结。结果表明,同一仪器不同时段的数据及不同仪器相同时间的数据重复性均较好。According to the DL/T 1520—2016, the PM-10（Dekati PM-10 Impactor, 30 L/min）, DGI（Dekati Gravimetric Impactor, 70 L/min） and ELPI（Electrical Low Pressure Impactor, 10 L/min） were used to carry out the field contrast test for coal-fired power plants. Based on field observations and literature research, the preliminary characterization of PM_（2.5） emissions in coal-fired power plant was summarized. The results show that the same instrument datum in the different periods and different instrument datum in the same time are all better repeatability and accuracy.

关 键 词：细颗粒物PM(2.5) 燃煤排放 PM-10撞击器 质量法撞击器 静电低压撞击器 

分 类 号：X505[环境科学与工程—环境工程]