检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈丽丽 Chen LiB(Emergency Department, Children's Hospital of Kaifeng City, Kaifeng 475000, Chin)
机构地区:[1]开封市儿童医院急诊科,475000
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2017年第22期3610-3612,共3页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的探究PICU痰液粘稠的肺炎患儿雾化吸入联合机械振动排痰的护理效果。方法两组均予以常规治疗,对照组在雾化吸入治疗后予以常规人工叩背排痰护理,观察组予以机械振动排痰护理,观察对比两组护理效果及满意度。结果两组在排痰量、肺部X线检查、双肺听诊及PICU住院天数比较中,观察组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。观察组护理满意率为95.3%,高于对照组79.1%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论对PICU痰液粘稠的肺炎患儿在雾化吸入治疗后开展机械振动排痰护理干预可取得满意度护理效果及护理满意度。Objective To explore the nursing effect of aerosol inhalation combined with mechanical vibration expectoration in children with viscous pneumonia of PICU. Methods Both groups were treated routinely. The control group was given routine artificial knock back expectoration nursing after aerosol inhalation, while the observation group was given mechanical vibration expectoration nursing. Observed nursing effects and satisfaction of the two groups. Results The observation group was superior to the control group in the terms of the amount of nursing, lung X-ray examination, lung auscultation, and PICU hospitalization days (1〈0.05). The rate of nursing satisfaction in the observation group was 95.3%, significantly higher than 79.1% in the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Mechanical vibration expectoration nursing intervention after aerosol inhalation for children with sputum viscous pneumonia in PICU can achieve satisfactory nursing effect and nursing satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62