《南雍州记》三种及其辑本考述  

A Research on the Three Types of Record of Southern Yongzhou State & Its Collections

作　　者：张帆帆[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学文学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《济宁学院学报》2017年第4期54-59,共6页Journal of Jining University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"魏晋南北朝私撰史籍与文学之关系及其影响研究"(13BZW056)

摘　　要：南雍州,东晋时侨置襄阳,所治包括今湖北、河南部分地区。《南雍州记》,今所见有王韶之作、郭仲产作、鲍至作三种。王韶之《南雍州记》,史志皆不载,《说郛》辑得六条,黄奭《汉学堂丛书》所辑六条与《说郛》同,应即直接从《说郛》中摘录而成。郭仲产《南雍州记》与鲍至《南雍州记》史志皆有著录,二书约亡于宋元之交。今存《南雍州记》各家辑本均存在漏辑、误辑的情况。《说郛》《汉学堂丛书》所辑王韶《南雍州记》六条作者皆存疑,王谟、黄惠贤、刘纬毅各家所辑《南雍州记》亦均存在误辑、漏辑、重辑等问题。Southern Yongzhou state, was established in Xiang Yang during the Eastern Jin Dynasty. It governs Hubei province and most areas of Henan province. Record of Southern Yongzhou state had been written by Wang Shaozhi/Gtio Zhongchan and Bao zhi respectively. Historical annals didn＇ t record Wang＇ s works . Shuofu collected six articles of Wang＇ s works as the same as Han Xue Tang Series by Huang Shi. Guo and Bao＇ s works recorded by historical annals, both of the two works disappeared during Song and Yuan dynasty（ Wang Mo/Liu Weiyi and Hang Huixian collected their works. The collection books of Record of Southern Yongzhou state now we can see all have the problem of collecting by mistakes and collecting by leakage. Textual research on those collection books can clarify some articles＇ authenticity and its attribution.

关 键 词：《南雍州记》 王韶 郭仲产 鲍至 辑佚 

分 类 号：K235[历史地理—历史学]