刑事司法精神鉴定中的矛盾分析及程序应对  

Analysis on the Conflicts and Solutions by Procedure in Criminal Forensic Psychiatry

作　　者：崔凯[1] 魏建文[2] Cui Kai Wei Jianwen

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《法学杂志》2017年第11期121-127,共7页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：2015年国家社科基金青年项目"被追诉人的程序平等权研究"(编号:15CFXD);2016年度湖南省人民检察院检察理论研究课题"刑事司法精神鉴定问题研究"(编号:XJ2016C10)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：与其他类型司法鉴定相比,司法精神鉴定较为特殊。精神医学的特点决定了刑事责任能力认定与司法精神鉴定直接对接,且鉴定意见本身也存在一定的错误。鉴定人在刑事责任认定问题上的强势、鉴定内容无法通俗化表达、鉴定意见结果不确定等问题客观存在。如果实体的改革无法达到目的,那么对诉讼程序进行调整,如加强程序的参与性,建立重点案件鉴定人出庭制度,选任精神医学专家担任人民陪审员等,才是化解鉴定意见风险、提高司法公信力的有效途径。Forensic psychiatry is more special than other types of forensic sciences. The fea- tures of psychiatry determine that there are close relationships between forensic psychiatry and criminal responsibility, and the expert opinion aslo may be wrong. There are some problems such as the experts play too important roles on criminal responsibility, the contents of opinions can not express popularization, the results on expert opinions is uncertain. We can find the procedural way to mitigate risks and enhance the credibility. There are some methods such as explanding the participation in litigations, the experts attend the trials in key cases, electeing the psychiatry ex- perts as Jury.

关 键 词：司法精神鉴定 不确定性 程序解决 

分 类 号：D919.3[医药卫生—法医学]