高校科研业绩量化评价中的常见陷阱及超越策略  

The Common Traps and the Surpassing Strategy of Research Performance Quantitative Evaluation in Universities

作　　者：汤建民[1,2] 邱均平[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学中国科学评价研究中心 [2]武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《科技进步与对策》2017年第15期101-106,共6页Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基　　金：中国科协创新战略研究院项目(2016ysxh1-3-9)

摘　　要：如何全面、客观、科学合理地评价各高校及高校内部各机构、各学科和各科研人员的科研业绩,是每个高校都必须尽力解决好的一个非常重要而又较为困难的问题。目前,大部分高校科研评价中都或多或少地存在偏差,其部分根源在于3种陷阱,即对学科间存在的学科差异了解不够,对各种科研成果的宏观总量了解不够,对各类科研活动及成果的真实发展速度了解不够。对此,提出了基于同类相比原则的数量与占比相结合的高校科研评价方法,强调科研管理部门尽量全面掌握各学科性质差异、各类数据库的收录范围和年度收录总量变化情况,以及各类科研成果产出总量的发展态势。该方法的实施有利于更科学、公正、合理地做好高校科研业绩评价工作。How to assess research performance of each university,and their internal institutions,disciplines and researchers in an overall,objective and reasonable way,is the most important and difficult problem that each university needs to solve.Currently,most universities have different degrees of bias in scientific research evaluation,which partial originates from three different traps:the difference of disciplines is not enough understood;the amount of scientific research results is not enough understood;the developing speed of various scientific research activities and results is not enough understood.According to these situations,this essay adopts a research assessment method on the basis of similar comparison principle,which combines quantity and proportion,emphasizes that scientific research management department should comprehensively grasp property differences of all disciplines,collection scope of all kinds of database,changes of total amount and developing trend of scientific research output.And this method can assess research development situation of universities more scientifically,more fairly and more reasonably.

关 键 词：科研评价方法 科研业绩考核 科研量化评价 文献计量 

分 类 号：G644[文化科学—高等教育学]