机构地区:[1]长海医院感染科,上海200433 [2]第二军医大学免疫研究所
出 处:《中华传染病杂志》2017年第9期528-532,共5页Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases
基 金:上海市自然科学基金(16ZR1400400,09ZR1400500);上海市卫生局基金(2012094)
摘 要:目的明确分泌IL-35的调节性B细胞(i35-Breg)及其效应因子IL-35在CHB患者外周血水平及其与HBVDNA和肝脏炎症程度的相关性。方法选择初治CHB患者35例,普通干扰素治疗的HBeAg阳性CHB患者17例,健康对照者15名,应用流式细胞术和ELISA检测上述研究对象外周血i35-Breg及IL35表达水平。统计学处理采用Kruskal—Wallis检验、Wilcox秩和检验以及两变量相关性分析。结果初治CHB患者外周血i35-Breg为3.05%(0.89%,4.97%),IL-35为2.81μg/L(0.30/μg/L,12.33μg/L),明显高于健康对照者的0.17%(0.13%,0.45%)和0.17μg/L(0,1.93ug/I,),差异有统计学意义(z值分别为-3.309、-2.419,P值分别为0.001、0.016)。初治CHB患者外周血i35Breg细胞水平与HBVDNA呈负相关(r=-0.529,P=0.008),IL-35水平与HBVDNA水平无相关性(r=0.11,P=0.54)。HBeAg阳性初治CHB患者i35Breg水平为3.16%(1.34%,5.62%),IL-35水平为4.58μg/L(0.79μg/L,22.37μg/L),均明显高于健康对照者,差异有统计学意义(F值分别为3.39、3.37,均P〈0.01)。ALT和AsT〈300U/L的CHB患者外周血IL-35水平分别为3.03弘g/L(o.74μg/L,22.37μg/L)和3.25μg/L(0.83μg/L,22.35μg/L),与健康对照者比较差异有统计学意义(F值分别为2.868、3.114,均P〈0.01)。ALT〈300U/L的初治CHB患者外周血i35-Breg细胞水平为3.14%(1.03%,4.65%),与健康对照者比较差异有统计学意义(F=3.219,P=0.004)。干扰素治疗早期患者外周血IL-35水平呈下降趋势,但差异无统计学意义(Х^2=1.45,P=0.48);持续病毒学应答者基线IL-35水平为0(0,13.33μg/L),低于部分应答或无应答者的0.61μg/L(0,24.72μg/L),但差异无统计学意义(F=0.75,P=0.68)。结论i35-Breg细胞及其效应因子参与慢Objective To explore the level of interleukin 35-producing B cells (i35 Breg) as well as its effect factors, interleukin-35 (IL-35), in peripheral blood of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), and their relationship with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and liver inflammatory degree. Methods A total of 35 treatment-naive CHB patients, 17 interferon (IFN)-treated Ht3eAg-positive CHB patients and 15 healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. The levels of i35-Breg and IL-35 in peripheral blood were tested by flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorption assay (ELISA). Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcox rank sum test and two variables correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results The percentage of i35 Breg cells as well as IL-35 level in peripheral blood of naive CHB patients were 3.05~ (0. 89~~, 4. 97%) and 2.81 ffg/L (0. 30 μg/L, 12.35 μg/L), respectively, which were both significantly higher than those in HC group, which were 0.17 % (0.13 %, 0.45%) and 0. 17 fig/L(0, 1.93 fig/L), respectively. The difference were statistical significant(Z=--3. 309 and --2. 419, respectively, P=0. 001 and 0. 016, respectively). The peripheral level of i35- Breg was negatively correlated with the viral load in treatment-naive CHB patients (r=--0. 529, P= 0. 008), while there was no correlation between the peripheral level of IL-35 and the viral load in treatment-naive CHB patients (r=0.11, P= 0.54). The levels of i35-Breg and IL-35 in HBeAg positive CHB patients were 3.16~//00 (1.34%, 5.62%) and 4.58μg/L (0.79 μg/L, 22.37μg/L), respectively, which were both higher than those in HC group. The difference was statistically significant (F= 3.39 and 3.37, respectively, both P〈0.01). Compared to HC group, the IL-35 levels in peripheral blood of CHB patients with ALT and AST levels less than 300 U/L were 3. 03 μg/L (0. 74 μg/L, 22. 37 μg/L) and 3. 25 tzg/L (0.83 μg/L, 22.35 /xg/L), respectively, with statistically significant difference (F= 2.
关 键 词:肝炎 乙型 慢性 白细胞介素-35 分泌白细胞介素35的B细胞
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...