检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏煜鑫[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《河南社会科学》2017年第10期103-107,共5页Henan Social Sciences
基 金:2017年中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院"研究生创新教育计划"(2017BX06)
摘 要:《刑法修正案(九)》对扰乱法庭秩序罪作出了修改,但与该罪有关的司法解释未颁布,导致在司法实践中扰乱法庭秩序罪的具体法律适用存在争议和空白点。扰乱法庭秩序罪的犯罪客体是法庭审理案件的正常秩序。弄清扰乱法庭秩序罪的犯罪构成是该罪得以正确适用法律的重要前提。该罪的司法办案要点有三:法庭的认定、法庭秩序范围的认定、扰乱法庭秩序行为的认定。扰乱法庭秩序罪类的刑事案件应按照我国一般公诉案件的诉讼流程去处理。The clause of crime of disturbance of court order has been amended in Amendment(IX) to the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, but the judicial interpretation of the crime has not been issued, which has resulted in disputes and blank spot in judicial practice and legal application. The present paper analyzes the decision rule of the crime, identifies the judicial determination of issues like crime and noncrime, this crime and that crime, and how many crimes have been committed, and criteria of sentence,summarizes the main points of judicial handling based on cases, and finally proposes that the crime should be dealt with according to litigation process of the general public prosecution case, thus providing a reference for the legal application of cases concerning the crime of disturbing the court order.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31