事实与证据的高阶探究  

A Higher-order Inquiry for Facts and Evidence

作　　者：刘靖贤[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学哲学与公共管理学院,辽宁沈阳110136

出　　处：《河南社会科学》2017年第10期108-113,共6页Henan Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(15CZX035)

摘　　要：陈波提出替换性论题,即形而上学的事实概念应该被替换为认知的证据概念。但是,形而上学和认识论是哲学研究的两条平行路径,二者不可偏废。认知的证据概念并没有看起来那样美好,形而上学的事实概念也没有看起来那样糟糕。替换性论题应该被修改为替代性论题,即无论是形而上学还是认识论,直接的研究方式应该被替代为间接的研究方式。从直接到间接的转变表现为一种高阶探究方式,在溯因方法的框架下,这种高阶探究方式又表现为在多种因素的综合作用下寻找平衡点的过程。Chen Bo proposes the replacement thesis: the metaphysical concept'fact'should be replaced by the cognitive concept 'evidence'. But metaphysics and epistemology are two parallel approaches in philosophical studies. The cognitive concept'evidence'is not as good as it appears to be, and the metaphysical concept'fact'is not as bad as it appears to be. The replacement thesis should be revised as the substitution thesis: in both metaphysics and epistemology, mediate method should be substituted for immediate one. The transformation from immediate method to mediate one manifests itself as a higher-order inquiry, which, on the basis of abduction, seeks an equilibrium point between various factors.

关 键 词：事实 证据 高阶探究 平衡点 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]