日本解禁集体自卫权的进程与违宪解读  

Interpretation of the Process and Anti-constitution of Lifting the Ban on Collective Self-defense in Japan

作　　者：刘畅[1] 徐鹏[2] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学行政学院 [2]吉林大学管理学院

出　　处：《东北亚论坛》2017年第6期36-45,共10页Northeast Asia Forum

基　　金：2018年度吉林省教育厅人文社科研究规划项目;吉林大学廉政建设专项课题(2016LZY006)

摘　　要：解禁集体自卫权在宪法层面上涉及的是宪法规范的变动问题,安倍政权推进解禁集体自卫权是典型的宪法规范的不正常变动,其本质是对宪法的破坏和侵害,属于违宪行为。本文从禁止集体自卫权的法的内涵入手,阐释禁止集体自卫权的渊源、主体和内容,以及日本解禁集体自卫权的进程。在此基础上,从宪法修改的前提条件、宪法修改的实质性限制、宪法修改的程序性规定、内阁的宪法解释权限,以及《日本国宪法》与《波兹坦公告》和《开罗宣言》之间的法律位阶关系等方面,对日本解禁集体自卫权的违宪问题进行法理分析。From the constitutional level, lifting the ban on the collective self-defense right is a change in the constitution. And Abe administration's attempt to do so is a typical irregular change of the constitution, whose essence is the destruction and encroachment of the constitution and the violation of the constitution. From the connotation of the ban on the collective self-defense right, this paper elucidates the origin, the main part and the content of the ban on the collective self-defense right and the process of putting a ban on it. And the paper, which interprets the premise, the substantial restrictions, and the procedural rules of the amendment of the constitution, the constitutional interpretation authority of the Japanese cabinet and the legal status relationship among the constitution of Japan, Potsdam Proclamation, and Cairo Declaration, makes a legal analysis of the violation of the constitution.

关 键 词：日本 解禁集体自卫权 日本国宪法 宪法侵害 

分 类 号：D831.33[政治法律—政治学]