“取象比类”与《黄帝内经》“藏象说”逻辑建构  

Cognitive Analysis on the Logical Construction and Connection between Chinese Holistic Reasoning by Metaphor and Analogy and the Theory of Visceral Manifestation in Huangdi-Neijing

作　　者：陈波[1] 孙可兴[1] 张晓芒[2] 

机构地区：[1]河南中医药大学中医药与经济社会发展研究中心,河南郑州450046 [2]南开大学哲学院,天津300350

出　　处：《湖北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第6期62-68,共7页Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目:14BZX077;河南省哲学社会科学规划资助项目:2017BZX009

摘　　要："取象比类"是中国传统哲学与传统逻辑思想中的重要思维方式之一,也是中国古代医家建构理论的重要方法。作为中医典籍《黄帝内经》理论内核之一的"藏象说",处处体现出"取象比类"的逻辑思维方式。探讨"取象比类"与"藏象说"逻辑建构的关系,能够为我国传统中医理论研究以及《黄帝内经》逻辑方法研究提供重要的学理依据。如果说《黄帝内经》"藏象说"中的"取象比类",作为思维方式的运用和呈现,因为理论建构的需要,成为一种不断推进的过程,或者说不断涵盖论题的建构模式,那么我们不妨说这是一种升华:从一般思维方式上升到知觉思维,从知觉思维上升到合乎理性的逻辑建构。Reasoning by metaphor and analogy(Qu xiang bi lei),which was an important thinking method in ancient China,was also the important method of constructing medical theory of the traditional Chinese medicine. The 'theory of visceral manifestation'as the theoretical core of the'Huangdi-Neijing',which is one of the ancient Chinese medical classics,embodies the appliance of the reasoning by analogy. Exploring the relation of the logical construction between the reasoning by metaphor and analogy and the 'theory of visceral manifestation' will provide the academic basis for the study of the traditional Chinese medicine and the logical theory of the 'Huangdi-Neijing'.

关 键 词：取象比类 黄帝内经 藏象说 逻辑方法 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]