检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马春晓[1]
出 处:《河南财经政法大学学报》2017年第6期87-93,共7页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基 金:2016年度江苏省法学会青年课题"经济犯罪的法益研究"的阶段性研究成果(项目编号:SFH2016C04)
摘 要:2007年和2016年"两高"司法解释先后对收受财物后再处理行为作出规定,但争议和误识仍然存在。理解司法解释应当以法益为导向、立足犯罪构成,践行刑事政策不得突破刑法的藩篱。受贿罪以职务行为的不可收买性为保护法益,受贿故意的成立必须以明知财物是职务或者职务行为的交易对价为前提。收受财物后再处理行为已经实现了受贿罪成立的客观构成要件行为,司法解释认定其"不是受贿"的根据在于行为人主观上缺乏受贿的故意。司法解释相关条文的内涵以及条文间的逻辑关系因此得以厘清,当前司法认定中错误观点也得以匡正。After Supreme People’s Court and Supreme People’s Procuratorate passed judicial interpretation to respond to the judicial determination of reprocessing after receiving property involving bribe crimes in 2007 and 2016,the practice has reached a common understanding about the behavior of reprocessing of bribe.However,some misunderstanding appears again about how to understand these interpretations themselves.The standpoint of the normative analysis should be settled up on the constitution of crime,guided with the legal interest functioning,and the criminal policy could not break through the barriers of criminal law.According to the nature of "collusion between power and money",the legal interest of crime of bribery should be defined as"non-trading of office and official behaviors".The mens rea of bribery is therefore necessarily related to the awareness of the accepted property as a consideration for the office and official behaviors.It cannot be considered as already given,when the bribe only has the consciousness about the behavior of receiving property and the intention to purchase unlawful interest for the bribery."No bribery"means that the the element of bribery is not fulfilled yet.It can only be interpreted as not-existing of subjective intentional acts of bribery,when the objective elements of the bribery is already fulfilled through the behavior of receiving property.Based on the analysis above,the judicial interpretation of the connotation and logical relationship between the provisions of the relevant provisions can be clearly clarified,as well as the erroneous views in current judicial determination can be ajusted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222