检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽警官职业学院 [2]安徽财经大学金融学院
出 处:《价格理论与实践》2017年第10期38-41,共4页Price:Theory & Practice
摘 要:《反垄断法》语境中的价格歧视属于滥用市场支配地位垄断行为之一。《反垄断法》对价格歧视规制存在认定标准不清晰、法律责任规制不完备、价格歧视行为合理抗辩和适用例外法律规制笼统粗略一系列问题;针对以上《反垄断法》对价格歧视规制的不足,建议在配套法规中明确价格歧视行为违法的法律要件和列举行为合理抗辩和适用例外事由。同时补充《反垄断法》中有关滥用市场支配地位法律责任规定,形成包括行政责任、民事责任和刑事责任的完备法律体系。The price discrimination in the context of antimonopoly law is one of the monopolistic behaviors of abusing the dominant position of the market. "Anti monopoly law" standard is not clear and the regulation of legal liability is not complete, price discrimination and reasonable defense exceptions of legal regulation of a series of gen- eral recognition of the existence of price discrimination regulation; for these defi- ciencies of the ~anti-monopoly law~ regulation of price discrimination, in supporting regulations in clear legal illegal price discrimination are exceptions cause defense and reasonable behavior. At the same time, the legal provisions of abusing the dominant position of the market in the antimonopoly law are supplemented to form a complete legal system including administrative responsibility, civil liability and criminal responsibility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.250.173