检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡海生 曾军[1] 刘苇 HU Haisheng;ZENG Jun;LIU Wei(Central Hospital of Xinyu Iron and Steel Group Co. Ltd, Xinyu 338000, Jiangxi Province, China;School of Nursing and Rehabilitation of Xinyu College, Xinyu 338000, Jiangxi Province, China)
机构地区:[1]江西省新余钢铁集团有限公司中心医院,江西新余338000 [2]江西省新余学院护理与康复学院,江西新余338000
出 处:《上海医药》2017年第22期16-17,34,共3页Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
摘 要:目的 :评估药学干预对促进合理用药的应用意义。方法 :选择2015年7—10月收治的36例患者为对照组,2016年3—6月收治的35例患者为观察组,对观察组实施药学干预,对照组给予常规给药。结果 :观察组合理用药率为94.29%、对照组为72.22%(P<0.05);观察组抗菌素使用率、药物不良反应率分别为37.14%、2.86%,对照组分别为61.11%、19.44%(P<0.05);观察组住院时间、药品费用和抗菌药物费用均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 :在临床用药过程中实施药学干预,可有效提高合理用药水平,提高药物治疗效果。Objective: To evaluate the application significance of pharmaceutical intervention in the promotion of rational use of drugs. Methods: From July to October 2015, 36 patients were selected as a control group, and from March to June 2016 35 patients were selected as an observation group. The observation group was treated with pharmaceutical intervention, and the control group given routine administration. Results: The rates of rational drug use were 94.29% in the observation group and 72.22% in the control group(P〈0.05). The rate of antibiotics usage and drug adverse reaction of the observation group were 37.14% and 2.86% and those of the control group were 61.11% and 19.44%, respectively(P〈0.05). The hospitalization time, drug expenses and antibiotic cost of the observation group were lower than those of the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion: In the course of clinical medication, the implementation of pharmaceutical intervention can efectively improve the level of rational use of drugs and improve the efect of drug treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.254