阿普斯特用于治疗银屑病关节炎的疗效和安全性的Meta分析  被引量:5

A Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of apremilast in psoriatic arthritis patients

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:程刚英[1] 杨洋[2] 刘珏[1] 

机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉中心医院药学部,湖北武汉430014 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院药学部,湖北武汉430030

出  处:《中国医院药学杂志》2017年第20期2065-2071,共7页Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy

基  金:武汉市科技局晨光计划(编号:2014070404010226);武汉市中青年人才计划

摘  要:目的:评价阿普斯特(apremilast,APR)治疗银屑病关节炎(psoriatic arthritis,PsA)的有效性和安全性。方法:检索"PubMed"、"Cochrane Library"、"OVID"公开发表的相关研究,并查询"clinictrials.gov"。进行文献质量评价和资料提取,用Rev Man5.3.5软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT)文献6篇,共计1 645例PsA患者。Meta分析结果显示,在治疗PsA的有效性方面,治疗12周或16周后,APR各剂量组合并后ACR20缓解率高于安慰剂对照组,RR=1.67[95%CI(1.36,2.05),P<0.000 01];HAQ-DI(Health assessment questionnaire-disability index)也优于安慰剂对照组,WMD=-0.14[95%CI(-0.17,-0.11),P<0.000 01]。在安全性方面,APR各剂量组合并后不良事件(adverse event,AEs)发生率高于安慰剂对照组,RR=1.91[95%CI(1.41,2.59),P<0.000 1]。结论:APR治疗可有效延缓或改善PsA病情,虽然导致不良反应,但患者耐受性良好。OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of apremilast(APR)against psoriatic arthritis(PsA).METHODS Studies were searched in PubMed,Cochrane Library,OVID,‘clinicaltrails.gov'.After information collection and methodology quality evaluation,Meta-analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.3 software.RESULTS A total of 6 randomized controlled trials(RCTs)and 1 645 patients were included.The results of Meta-analysis indicated that,compared with controlled studies,APR combined ACR20 had higher remission and superior Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index(HAQ-DI)compared to placebo(PBO)(RR=1.67,95% CI(1.36,2.05),P0.000 01;WMD=-0.14,95% CI(-0.17,-0.11),P0.000 01,respectively),and the incidence rates of adverse events(AEs)were higher than those of PBO(RR=1.91,95% CI(1.41,2.59),P0.000 1).CONCLUSION APR is effective and safe in PsA patients.

关 键 词:银屑病关节炎 阿普斯特 META分析 

分 类 号:R969[医药卫生—药理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象