中国学刊“走出去”的理论误区与路径抉择——以大学学报为切入点  

The Theoretical Misunderstandings and Options for the "Going out" of Chinese Academic Journal: An Analysis of Academic Journals Published by Universities

作　　者：尹玉吉 李逢超 王姣 

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学学报(社会科学版)编辑部,山东淄博255000 [2]朔州广播电视台,山西朔州036000

出　　处：《编辑之友》2017年第11期31-36,56,共7页Editorial Friend

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目"中西方学术期刊出版机制比较研究"(10BXW011)

摘　　要：第一,学术期刊"专业化""数字化""去同质化"与"特色化"是理论误区因而不能成立,学术期刊履行使命必须排除"四化论"的干扰;第二,学报"四化论"客观上使得各个学术期刊做朝三暮四式的稿源争夺,必然导致对学术期刊使命的淡漠与忘却,致使中国学术期刊陷入理论认识误区,因此必须正确认识学术编辑在学术活动、学术期刊工作中的地位与作用,因为学术期刊出版规律不以编辑意志为转移;第三,对学术期刊使命的漠视必然导致中国学术期刊迟迟不能"走出去",这极大地伤害了中国学术期刊与学术事业,因此,应当科学认识学术期刊使命,学术期刊编辑必须强化使命担当,履职尽责;第四,中国学术期刊"走出去"的路径首先是学术期刊使命应当回归本位,其次是中国学术期刊评价体系必须改弦更张,必须明晰中国学术期刊改革的这些路径抉择。First, the interference from the theory of ＂specialization＂, ＂digitization＂, ＂de-homogenization＂ and ＂characterization＂ must be eliminated in the development of academic journals because this theory, basically a theoretical misunderstanding, is groundless. Second, since editors cannot make the final decision about the publication, their roles and responsibilities in academic activities and periodical works should be stated clearly, as the ＂four-zations＂ may objectively lead various academic journals to compete for valuable contributors, which is bound to cause the neglect or indifference to their missions. Third, the mission of academic journal should be clarified scientifically because the indifference to their assignments inevitably slows down the process of ＂going out＂, which greatly hurts the development of Chinese academic journals. Meanwhile, editors should strengthen their missions and responsibilities too. Fourth, the path of ＂going out＂ should be based on the journal＇s original positioning. Lastly, the evaluation system of academic journals also should be altered in order to meet the needs of reform.

关 键 词：四化论 走出去 使命 二维评价 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]