作为国际法规范的“保护的责任”——以国际法渊源为基准  

The “Responsibility to Protect” as a Norm of International Law:On the Basis of the Origins of International Law

作　　者：史晓曦[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院西亚非洲研究所,助理研究员100007

出　　处：《国际政治研究》2017年第5期126-138,共13页The Journal of International Studies

摘　　要：在联合国的大力推动下,"保护的责任"作为一个重要概念,正进入国际社会成员针对集体行动的讨论之中。然而,这个新理念是否已经成为一项国际法规范则尚存争议。按照传统的国际法理论,"保护的责任"在法律效力、规范认同等各个方面都存在缺陷。但是,依据国际法渊源的理论,"保护的责任"原则可以从人权公约中找到其法律效力来源,特别是《联合国宪章》以及《关于防止及惩治种族灭绝罪公约》等国际法文件;此外,由于"保护的责任"已经通过了联合国大会的审议,并且在重大国际决策中成为各个国家绕不开的议题,因此可以说,"保护的责任"包含在正处于发展中的国际社会的基本价值中。总之,"保护的责任"是一种国际政治话语策略,而不是一个无法律效力的、空洞的政治修辞。Due to the vigorous push by the United Nations,the 'Responsibility to Protect,'(R2 P)as an important concept,has triggered a discussion about collective action by the international society.However,it is still controversial whether this idea has already become a norm of international law.According to the traditional theory of international law,R2 Phas its weaknesses in terms of its legal validity and normative acceptance.Nevertheless,according to the theory of the origins of international law,the principle of R2 P can be traced to human rights covenants,in particular the Charter of the United Nations and the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.Furthermore,since R2 P has passed the deliberation by the United Nations and has become an unavoidable issue for major policy-making internationally,it should be part of the still-evolving basic values of the international society.In short,R2 Pis a discourse tactic in international politics instead of an empty political rhetoric without legal validity.

关 键 词：国际政治理论 “保护的责任” 国际人权法 法律渊源 法律效力 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]