检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学医学院,上海200092 [2]上海市杨浦区殷行社区卫生服务中心,上海200438 [3]同济大学附属上海市肺科医院,上海200433 [4]同济大学附属第一妇婴保健院,上海200040
出 处:《上海护理》2017年第6期21-25,共5页Shanghai Nursing
基 金:上海市杨浦区卫生计生系统"百医登高"青年人才骨干培养计划项目(杨卫计委党委[2013]26号)
摘 要:目的应用Delphi法构建社区舒缓疗护的架构,体现国内舒缓疗护的服务特点,确立舒缓疗护的准入标准。方法通过文献回顾研究法并根据研究主题遴选28名专家进行两轮Delphi专家咨询。于2014年9—11月采用自制的问卷进行电子邮件征询调查,主要包括专家基本情况;舒缓疗护准入标准,其中一级指标5项(服务对象、状态评估、社会心理、症状与体征及多维评估),二级指标18项和三级指标49项;专家对问卷内容熟悉程度评价表。结果两轮函询问卷回收率均为100%,专家的积极性好,权威程度处于较高水平,专家的协调程度良好。完善后的舒缓疗护准入标准共确立一级指标5项、二级指标21项、三级指标61项。结论应用Delphi法构建的社区舒缓疗护准入标准,筛选的条目符合社区舒缓疗护切合实际,可为我国社区开展舒缓疗护提供借鉴和参考。Objective To establish the access standards of palliative care in community by using Delphi method, and to highlight the service characteristics. Methods According to literature review and research topic, 28 experts were selected for two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. From September to November 2014, a self-made questionnaire was used, mainly including the experts' basic information; access standards of palliative care: 5 first-grade indexes (service object, status evaluation, social psychology, symptoms and signs, and multi-dimensional evaluation), 18 second-grade indexes and 49 third-grade indexes; evaluation form of experts' familiarity degree with the questionnaire contents. Results The recovery rates of the two rounds of consultation were 100%, the experts had high level of enthusiasm, authority and excellent coordination. The improved access standards included 5 first-grade indexes, 21 second-grade indexes and 61 third-grade indexes. Conclusion The established access standards of palliative care in community by using Delphi method are practical and can provide reference for domestic application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15