检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟星宇[1]
机构地区:[1]东南大学法学院
出 处:《法学评论》2017年第6期52-62,共11页Law Review
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目"城市交通规划法治问题研究"(12AFX006)的阶段性成果
摘 要:政府信息公开范围、公开主体制度的设定缺陷一直困扰着政府信息公开的推进。以《政府信息公开条例》为核心的传统政府信息公开制度难以对日渐具体化、部门化的信息公开问题做出有效规制。以城市交通规划领域为观察,政府信息公开范围的设定应从概括的、宏观的抽象规定拓展到具体的、微观的和含有特定部门属性的政府信息领域。行政组织法对"事权"的职能划分是判断和确认公开主体的最有效标准。信息公开研究的场域应从单一的信息公开基本法向相关部门行政法扩展,与政府信息相关的部门法也应纳入信息公开制度体系予以考量。信息过载以及公示制度的私法逻辑成为降低信息公开效率的主要原因,对不应公开的信息应构建"负面清单"制度予以排除,对政府信息分类义务应以立法形式明示,对公示时效制度也应赋予公法属性。The government information disclosure system in China has been defective on the scope and the administrative subject.The defect has been plagued by the advancement of government information disclosure.With the Government Information Disclosure Regulations as the core of the traditional government information disclosure system,it is difficult to make effective regulation for the increasingly specific and the departmental information disclosure issues.The administrative organization law is the most effective way to judge and confirm the public administrative subject.The field of information disclosure should be expanded from the single information public basic law to the relevant departments,and the department laws related to government information should be included in the information disclosure system.The information overload and the private law logic of the public system are main reasons for the low efficiency of information disclosure.The information that should not be disclosed should be prohibited by"the negative list",the obligation of classified government information should be cleared by law,and the prescription of the public system should also be given the attributes of public law.
关 键 词:城市交通规划 政府信息公开 公开范围 公开主体 公开效率
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.166.121