检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙静[1]
机构地区:[1]商丘市第一人民医院重症监护室ICU,河南商丘476100
出 处:《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》2016年第18期38-39,共2页Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology
摘 要:目的探究集束化护理干预措施对机械通气患者呼吸机相关性肺炎发生的作用和影响。方法选择2015年5月-2016年7月在我院行机械通气患者50例,根据随机数字表法将所有患者分为两组。对照组患者予以常规护理,在此基础上给予观察组患者集束化护理干预。3个月后,比较两组患者住院天数与平均每天机械通气时间及呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。结果与对照组相比,观察组患者住院天数和平均每天机械通气时间较少,呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率较低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论对机械通气患者实施集束化护理干预措施可有效降低呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率和减少患者住院时间和平均机械通气时间。Objective To explore the efect and efect of cluster nursing intervention on ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with mechanical ventilation. Methods Fifty patients with mechanical ventilation from May 2015 to July 2016 were enrolled in this study. All patients were divided into two groups according to the random number table method. The patients in the control group were treated with routine care. On this basis, the patients in the observation group were treated with cluster nursing. After 3 months, the average number of hospital days and the average daily ventilation time and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the number of hospital stay and the average daily ventilation time were lower in the observation group, and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia was lower (P 〈0.05). Conclusion The intensive care interventions for patients with mechanical ventilation can efectively reduce the incidence of ventilator - associated pneumonia and reduce the hospital stay and mean time of mechanical ventilation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.235