机构地区:[1]宁波大学医学院附属医院胸外科,浙江宁波315030
出 处:《中国临床药理学杂志》2017年第21期2124-2126,2142,共4页The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基 金:浙江省医学会临床科研基金资助项目(2013ZYC-A75)
摘 要:目的观察参麦注射液对胸外科手术患者预后的临床疗效及安全性。方法将48例胸外科手术患者随机分为对照组24例和试验组24例。对照组于围手术期给予常规治疗;试验组在对照组治疗的基础上,于麻醉诱导后予以静脉滴注参麦注射液50 mL qd,连续给药5 d。比较2组患者术前和术后1,4,48,120 h血清白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、IL-8、补体C_3、C_4的变化、免疫功能,以及药物不良反应的发生情况。结果术后1,4,48,120 h,试验组的IL-6分别为(124.58±29.12),(90.26±15.83),(29.17±4.21)和(16.53±2.02)pg·mL^(-1),对照组的IL-6分别为(398.56±56.22),(239.68±34.23),(148.52±18.93)和(96.43±14.63)pg·mL^(-1);试验组的IL-8分别为(16.19±5.24),(9.26±3.13),(4.38±1.42)和(3.43±1.14)pg·mL^(-1),对照组的IL-8分别为(24.57±6.33),(19.79±3.17),(148.52±18.92)和(96.4±14.63)pg·mL^(-1),2组术后各时点的IL-6和IL-8比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。术前和术后1,4,48,120 h,试验组的补体C_3分别为(1.12±0.47)%,(0.85±0.22)%,(0.80±0.26)%,(0.78±0.19)%和(0.77±0.14)%,对照组的补体C_3分别为(1.10±0.47)%,(0.61±0.28)%,(0.76±0.24)%,(0.83±0.21)%和(0.81±0.16)%;试验组的补体C_4分别为(0.49±0.27)%,(0.31±0.16)%,(0.35±0.14)%,(0.36±0.17)%和(0.35±0.15)%,对照组的补体C_4分别为(0.51±0.28)%,(0.37±0.21)%,(0.32±0.18)%,(0.39±0.14)%和(0.37±0.16)%,且2组术后各时点的补体C_3和C_4水平与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。术前和术后1,4,48,120 h,试验组的CD_3^+分别为(69.87±2.34)%,(60.49±2.18)%,(54.17±1.78)%,(52.46±1.79)%和(51.41±1.79)%,对照组的CD_3^+分别为(70.12±2.47)%,(53.18±2.19)%,(52.52±1.79)%,(50.79±2.09)%和(50.31±1.72)%;试验组的CD_4^+分别为(43.04±3.85)%,(35.46±2.56)%,(32.17±1.98)%,(29.59±2.14)%和(29.21±2.11)%,对照组的CD_4^+分别为(42.93±2.51)%,(32.73±2.28)%,(30.41±2.04)%,(31.14±1.89)%和(30.57±2.16)%;试验组的CD_4^+/CD_8^+分别为(1.57±0.39),(1.40±0.41),(1.39±0.37),(1.37±0Objective To study the clinical effect and safety of Shenmai injection on the prognosis of thoracic surgery patients. Methods Atotal of 48 patients with thoracic surgery were randomly divided into control group and treatment group with 24 cases per group. Conventional perioperative treatment was taken for both of them. While the treatment group had additional application of Shenmai injection,which was given by intravenous infusion,50 mL,qd,after anesthesia induction,and was continuously used for 5 d. The serum levels of interleukin-6( IL-6),IL-8,complement C3,complement C4,immunologic function,and adverse drug reactions at the time of preoperative and postoperative 1,4,48,120 h were compared between two groups. Results After operative 1,4,48,120 h,the levels of IL-6 in treatment group were( 124. 58 ± 29. 12),( 90. 26 ± 15. 83),( 29. 17 ± 4. 21) and( 16. 53 ± 2. 02) pg·mL^-1; while in the control group were( 398. 56 ± 56. 22),( 239. 68 ± 34. 23),( 148. 52 ± 18. 93) and( 96. 43 ± 14. 63) pg · mL^-1. The level of IL-8 in treatment group were( 16. 19 ± 5. 24),( 9. 26 ± 3. 13),( 4. 38 ± 1. 42) and( 3. 43 ± 1. 14) pg · mL^-1;while IL-8 of the control group were( 24. 57 ± 6. 33),( 19. 79 ± 3. 17),( 148. 52 ± 18. 92) and( 96. 4 ± 14. 63)pg·mL^-1. The differences of The IL-6 and IL-8 in the two groups at each time point after the operation were statistically significant( all P〈0. 05). At the time of before operative and after perative 1,4,48,120 h,the level of complement C3 in the treatment group were( 1. 12 ± 0. 47) %,( 0. 85 ± 0. 22) %,( 0. 80 ± 0. 26) %,( 0. 78 ± 0. 19) % and( 0. 77 ± 0. 14) %; while in control group were( 1. 10 ± 0. 47) %,( 0. 61 ± 0. 28) %,( 0. 76 ± 0. 24) %,( 0. 83 ± 0. 21) % and( 0. 81 ± 0. 16) %. The level of C4 in the treatment group were( 0. 49 ± 0. 27) %,( 0. 31 ± 0. 16) %,( 0. 35 ± 0. 14) %,( 0. 36 ± 0. 17) % and( 0. 35 ± 0. 15�
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...