国有企业高管篡夺公司机会的法律规制——企业法与刑法衔接视域下的国企腐败防控  

Preventing State-Owned Enterprise Executives from Corruptions such as Usurping Corporate Property Based on the Integration of Enterprise and Criminal Laws

作　　者：王彦明[1] 王红云[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2017年第6期42-54,共13页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：吉林省哲学社会科学规划项目(2014B2);吉林大学廉政建设专项研究课题(2015LZY040)

摘　　要：近年来,国企高管腐败问题频发,篡夺公司机会已经成为国企高管进行利益输送的一种重要途径,规制国企高管篡夺公司机会行为的相关法律亟须完善。国企高管篡夺公司机会在法律性质上既是违背忠实义务的行为,也是侵害国有企业权益的行为,需要通过企业法(主要是公司法)和刑法共同进行规制。基于公司法和刑法的不同特点,在认定标准上,公司法应当适用绝对性规则,刑法则应以利益或期待因素为依据。基于公司法与刑法的不同功能,在责任追究上,一方面要明确划分国企高管的民事责任与刑事责任,另一方面要正确处理民事责任与刑事责任之间的关系,通过两种责任的无缝衔接实现对国企高管篡夺公司机会行为的有效防控。In recent years,corruptions of state-owned enterprise(SOE) executives have happened frequently,and usurping corporate property has become an important way to transfer benefits for those SOEs.So,the regulations and laws need to be improved.In terms of legal nature,their usurping of corporate opportunity is a breach of the duty of loyalty,and a violation of the rights of SOE,which needs the co-regulation by enterprise law(mainly corporation law) and criminal law.Based on the different characteristics of corporation law and criminal law,on the question of identification standard,corporation law should apply absolute rules,while criminal law should judge on the ground of interest or expectancy test.Based on the different functions of the above two laws,regarding law liabilities,on the one hand,we should clearly differentiate the civil liability from criminal liability for those SOE executives.On the other,we should handle the relation of civil liability and criminal liability properly,and prevent SOE executives from usurping corporate by connecting both liabilities seamlessly.

关 键 词：国有企业腐败 民刑责任 公司机会 忠实义务 认定标准 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学] D924.3[政治法律—法学]