政策工具视角下我国协商民主政策的量化研究  

A Quantitative Study on Policies of Deliberative Democracy from the Perspective of Policy Instrument

作　　者：张再生[1] 李鑫涛[1] 孙雪松 

机构地区：[1]天津大学管理与经济学部,天津300072

出　　处：《理论探讨》2017年第6期12-18,共7页Theoretical Investigation

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目"环境污染问题政治成本的产生机理;测度方法与治理模式研究"(16BGL138);天津市政府决策咨询重点课题项目"在简政放权转变职能背景下;我市进一步深化行政审批体制机制改革的研究"(ZFZX2016-32)阶段性成果

摘　　要：党的十八大以来,党中央出台了一系列推进协商民主发展的政策,构成了新时代我国协商民主政策的基本框架。但从协商民主政策的具体内容来看,政策的整体协调性、可操作性和法律法规保障还存在一定的局限。因此,基于政策工具的角度和统计检验的方法,选取近年来中央出台的四项协商民主政策为分析样本,运用内容分析法,构建协商民主政策的二维分析框架,对其文本内容进行模块划分、单元编码、归纳统计、量化分析和交叉检验,可得结果表明:当前我国协商民主政策中政策工具的使用存在明显分化,为完善协商民主政策体系,需加快协商民主相关法律的出台,强化协商民主自愿型政策工具,创新协商民主政策的实现渠道。Since The Eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China, Party Central Committee has put forward a se- ries of policies to promote the development of consultative democracy, which has built the basic framework of chinese consultative de- mocracy policy, for a row era While, when it comes to the specific content of the consultative democracy policies, there are some limi- tations in whole coordination, maneuverability and the laws and regulations guarantee. Thus, basing on the view of policy tool and statis- tical test ,this paper takes four consultative democracy policies the national government issued in recent years as samples, establishes the two -dimension alanalysis framework by using content analysis method and applies module division, unit coding, induction and statis- tics, quantitative analysis and cross - validation to the policies contents. The result shows that there is clear divergence in the using of policy tool about consultative democracy policy, and it is necessary- to improve the policy system of consultative democracy by accelera- ting the introduction of related laws, strengthening the consultative democracy voluntary policy tools . innovatinz its realization channels.

关 键 词：政策工具 交叉检验 协商民主 政策体系优化 

分 类 号：D627[政治法律—政治学]