民法典分则编纂建议——意定“动产担保物权法”部分  

The Proposals about the Codification of the Specfic Provisions of Civil Law Code

作　　者：董学立 

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学法学院,山东青岛210042

出　　处：《法学论坛》2017年第6期113-118,共6页Legal Forum

基　　金：作者主持的国家社科基金项目"动产担保物权一元化立法研究"(13BFX093);教育部社科基金项目"统一动产担保法立法研究"(12YJA820015)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：随着《民法典总则》的全文公布,学界对其编纂的研究将暂告一段落。民法典分则的编纂因迫于"时间表"的倒排压力被随即提上议事日程。对民法典分则的编纂,有一个总的思路就是在现有立法的基础上秉持"非改不可、非删不可、非增不可"。^((1))唯独对其中的意定动产担保物权部分,则应属另类而别论,是"动大手术"还是"动小手术",需要我们放眼世界、着眼未来,拿出决断。从我国意定动产的物权的立法现状看,从世界意定动产担保物权的立法发展来看,当是立足中国实际,应以"动大手术"为择。The study of the civillaw scholars will break off after the promulgation of the civillaw code in general rules. The codifi- cation of the specific provisions put on the agenda presently under the presures of the time table of the finishing the codification. The general thinking of the codiification in specific prividions is to based on the exsiting legislation and to change what must to change, to delete whta must to delete and to ade what must to ade. But only the part of the consensus security yinterests shuoud be treated especially, how to treat it？ Shoud we have a major operation or small operation？ We need open our eyes to the whole world, focus on the future and come up with a dicision. By the view of the our country＇s nowadays legisilation and the world＇s de- velopement in the consensus security interests law. We should choose the major operation in china.

关 键 词：民法典编纂 动产担保物权 一元化立法 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]