检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学经济学院
出 处:《城市问题》2017年第11期4-10,共7页Urban Problems
基 金:教育部人文社会科学基金规划一般项目(13YJA790112)
摘 要:基于中国30个省(市、区)的面板数据,运用门限回归模型就城镇化对贫困率的非线性影响进行了考察。结果显示:城镇化水平的提升有助于居民贫困率的降低,但是这一减贫效应具有明显的双门限特征;当城镇化率小于55.7%时,其减贫作用十分显著;当城镇化率在55.7%-68%时,其减贫作用开始放缓;当城镇化率超过68%时,其减贫作用不再显著。这一结果说明,当前城镇化进程同居民减贫之间存在着一定程度的非良性互动。此外,在城镇化进程中,金融发展和固定资产投资都在一定程度上有利于减贫,且金融发展程度的减贫作用要大于固定资产投资的减贫作用。Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China, the threshold regression model is used to investigate the nonlinear relationship between urbanization and poverty. The re- suits show that the improvement of the urbanization level contrib- utes to the reduction of the poverty rate of the residents, and the poverty reduction effect has obvious double threshold characteris- tics. When the urbanization rate is less than 55.7% , its effect on poverty alleviation is very significant. When the urbanization rate reaches between 55. 7% and 68% , its poverty reduction effect is slowed down. When the urbanization rate exceeds 68% , the effeet on poverty is no longer significant. This results mean that there is a certain degree of non - benign interaction between the current urbanization process and the reduction of poverty. In addition, to some extent, the degree of financial de- velopment and the investment in fixed assets are conducive to the alleviation of poverty in the process of urbanization. And the de- gree of financial development has more effect than the fixed asset investment on the poverty reduction
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117