检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属盛京医院胸外科,沈阳110004
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床与康复》2017年第11期1377-1379,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
摘 要:目的探讨食管癌患者胸腔镜术后引流管护理干预的应用价值。方法选取2013年10月至2015年10月间中国医科大学附属盛京医院收治的60例食管癌患者,采用双盲随机原则分为观察组与对照组,每组30例。观察组患者在术后常规护理基础上加强引流管护理,对照组患者采用常规护理干预,采用自制调查问卷记录两组患者干预前后对引流管知识的掌握程度,分析干预后护理质量满意度,对比不良反应发生情况。结果干预后,观察组患者对引流管知识的掌握程度、护理满意度及不良反应发生率均明显优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论食管癌患者胸腔镜术后采用常规护理加引流管针对性干预,能够促进患者引流管知识掌握程度,降低并发症发生率,值得临床推广。Objective To explore the significance of drainage-tube nursing intervention in patients with esophageal cancer after thoracoscopic surgery. Methods Sixty patients with esophageal cancer treated at Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University from October 2013 to October 2015 were selected. Patients were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group with 30 patients in each group. The observation group received drainage-tube nursing besides routine nursing care and the control group received routine nursing care. The self-made questionnaire was used to record patients' knowledge on drainage-tube before and after the intervention in the two groups. The satisfaction with nursing after the intervention was analyzed and adverse reactions were compared. Results After the intervention,patients' knowledge on drainage-tube,satisfaction and adverse reactions were better in the observation group than in the control group( all P〈0. 05). Conclusion The targeted intervention of conventional nursing plus drainage tube can promote the patients to grasp knowledge on drainage and reduce the complications of esophageal cancer after thoracoscopic surgery and thus it is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145