检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]北京市金杜律师事务所
出 处:《中国高校社会科学》2017年第6期84-96,共13页Social Sciences in Chinese Higher Education Institutions
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目"法治评估创新及其在中国的推广应用研究"(12ZDD041)成果
摘 要:针对我国法学教育评估面临的诸多问题,业界多缺乏清晰定位与实践驱动,传统上单纯基于入学情况、科研成果发表以及就业比率高低进行的教育评估实效性严重不足。从国际通例来看,主客观指标视角下的法学教育评估是较为有效的理论模型和研究工具。一方面,通过学术声誉、雇主声誉、社会声望等主观指标可审视法学教育的声誉评价,进而可用来分析其对教育声誉提升的影响;另一方面,导入以引用率、生师比为主要内容的客观指标体系,使之与主观指标相结合,实现量与质的统一,有助于提高法学教育评估的科学性与推动作用。在当前的中国法学教育评估中,要特别注意考虑法学教育的特殊性,立足中国国情,由综合评估向立体评估延伸,在民主指标方面扩大公众参与,并与"双一流"建设有效融合。Facing many problems,the circle of Chinese legal education lacks a clear orientation and practice driving.The traditional evaluation of Chinese legal education is in urgent need of the effectiveness now,which is based on the indicators such as the admission,scientific research and employment ratio.From the international general point of view,legal education evaluation based on the perspective of subjective and objective indicators,is a more effective theoretical model and research tool.On the one hand,we can review the reputation of legal education through the subjective indicators such as the academic reputation,the reputation of the employer,the social prestige and other indicators,and then can use them to analyze their impact on the promotion of education reputation.On the other hand,to achieve the unity of quality and quality,we try to introduce the reference rate and the teacher-student ratio as the main content of objective index system combined with the subjective indicators to improve the scientificity and promoting effect of the legal education assessment.In the current practice of Chinese legal education assessment,we should pay special attention to the particularity of legal education based on China’s national conditions.With the extension from the comprehensive assessment to the stereoscopic assessment,we should expand the public participations in terms of the democratic indicators,which are effectively integrated with'Double First-Class'initiative.
分 类 号:D920.0[政治法律—法学] G649.2[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46