检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗丹霞[1] 陈贵松[1] 林碧虾[1] 陈曼琳 郑才亮
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2017年第33期183-188,共6页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:福建省社会科学研究基地重大项目(2014r0012);福建省社科研究基地重大项目(FJ2015JDZ026)
摘 要:对2007—2015年9年间福建省6个滨海城市和3个内陆城市的旅游收入、旅游总人数、地区生产总值面板数据进行单位根检验、Hausman检验,并构建面板数据回归模型分析滨海城市和内陆城市旅游对经济增长的作用有何异同。研究结果表明:滨海城市和内陆城市旅游对经济增长具有积极的促进作用,内陆城市旅游对经济增长的作用不一定弱于滨海城市;不同城市的GDP的时间趋势不尽相同,有些城市比较平稳,比如宁德、南平,有些城市呈较快上升趋势,比如福州、泉州,内陆城市旅游总收入对地区生产总值的影响比滨海城市更大;滨海城市与内陆城市旅游合作对经济增长的作用明显。The article carried out the unit root test, Hausman test of tourism revenue, total number of tourists and regional GDP panel data of 6 coastal cities and 3 inland cities in Fujian Province between 2007 and 2015.Panel data regression model was built to analyze the coastal cit-ies and inland city tourism what is the similarities and differences between the effect on economic growth.The results showed that the coastal cities and inland cities had a positive effect on economic growth, and the economic growth of inland cities were not necessarily weaker than the coastal cities.Time trends of GDP were not the same in different cities, some cities were stable such as Ningde, Nanping, some cities showed a trend of rapid growth, such as Fuzhou, Quanzhou.The total tourism revenue of inland cities had a greater impact on GDP than that of the coastal cities.The cooperation between coastal cities and inland cities had obvious effect on economic growth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3