检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳市儿童医院康复二科,辽宁沈阳110032
出 处:《中国中医药现代远程教育》2017年第19期89-91,共3页Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
摘 要:目的探究小儿脑瘫中医证型与头部磁共振各向异性(FA)值的相关性。方法收集儿科收治的脑瘫儿童76例,根据中医辨证标准分为肝肾亏损、心脾两虚、脾虚肝亢、脾肾虚弱、痰瘀阻滞5种中医证型,均予以头部磁共振获得FA值。结果各中医证型FA值之间的关系:不同证型之间FA值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论脑瘫儿童不同中医证型之间头部磁共振获得FA值无明显差异,FA值作为中医分型的客观指标有待进一步探究。Objective To explore the correlation between TCM syndromes of infantile cerebral palsy and anisotropy value of head magnetic resonance imaging. Methods 76 cases of children with cerebral palsy were collected form department of pediatrics in our hospital. According to the standard of TCM for liver and kidney deficiency, spleen deficiency, spleen deficiency and hyperactivity of liver, spleen and kidney deficiency, phlegm and blood stasis syndrome 5 kinds of TCM syndrome, all patients were detected with head magnetic resonance anisotropy value. Results There was no significant difference in anisotropy value between TCM syndromes of different TCM syndromes( P〉0.05). Conclusion There is no significant difference in anisotropy value of head MRI between TCM syndromes of children with cerebral palsy, and anisotropy value should be further explored as an objective index of TCM classification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.225.144