仲裁案后中国应对南海争端的技术性路径与措施  

Copying with the Dispute after the South China Sea Arbitration:The “Technical” Approach and Countermeasures

作　　者：宋杰[1] 孙坤[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院 [2]浙江工商大学,国际法研究生浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《边界与海洋研究》2017年第4期44-53,共10页Journal of Boundary and Ocean Studies

摘　　要：在南海仲裁案裁决中,仲裁庭裁决南海断续线"非法"是建立在中国自身没有澄清该线法律性质和地位的前提和基础之上的。要推翻仲裁庭的裁决,中国只需要澄清该线的法律性质,指出该线与主权归属密切相关即可。中国宣告该线为"历史性群岛水域线"既能最大化自身在南海的权益,也能满足其他国家有关在此水域内航行自由和飞越自由的关切。中国一旦宣告该线为"历史性群岛水域线",就有必要采取配套的技术性措施予以巩固,在线内水域积极确立并行使管辖权。In the China￣Philippine South Sea arbitration the arbitral tribunals award that the nine￣dashline is “illegal” was contingent upon the unclear perquisite and basis of the lines legal nature as well as itsstatus China provided for In order to overturn the tribunals award China shall only need to clarify thelegal nature of the nine￣dash line to demonstrate the inalienable close connection between the line and itssovereignty Chinas declaration on the nine￣dash line as a ＂ historic archipelago waterline＂ will not onlymaximize its national interests in the South China Sea but will also respond to other countries concerns onthe freedom of navigation and the freedom of the air in this area Once China declares the line as a ＂historic archipelagic waterline” technical measures are necessary to be undertaken for consolidation andthe jurisdiction over the waters within the line is also necessary to be established and exercised vigorously.

关 键 词：南海仲裁案 南海断续线 历史性群岛水域线 确立和行使管辖权 

分 类 号：D993.5[政治法律—国际法学]