从1885年前西方绘制地图看钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿的归属  

Diaoyu Dao Belongs to China in Maps Published before 1885 Perspective

作　　者：夏帆[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学中国边界与海洋研究院 [2]国家领土主权与海洋权益协同创新中心

出　　处：《边界与海洋研究》2017年第4期112-128,共17页Journal of Boundary and Ocean Studies

摘　　要：带有行政区划的地图表达了制图者对领土归属的认知,属于领土与海洋争端案件中的辅助性书面证据。根据既往案例,地图证据证明分量大小主要受到地图精确度、是否经过边界条约认证、制图者身份以及表达一贯性等多重因素影响。据此分析1885年以前欧洲出版的6幅标注有钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿的地图,结果表明:这6幅地图均属于中立第三方绘制地图,地图绘制准确,且具有一贯性。由此可见,迟至18世纪中叶,钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿已被世界知晓。它们属于中国也已获得公认。其中1764年、1787年、1782年、1794年出版的4幅地图从出版背景或数据来源来看还带有官方背景,其证明分量更大于另外两幅地图,值得深入研究。According to territorial and maritime dispute cases maps are not the original source of legaltitle per se which were just treated as a secondary source of corroborative evidence Only when the mapis integrated into a boundary treaty or taken as an evidence of recognition it would form an irrefutablepresumption tantamount in fact to legal title fully embodying the physical expression of the will of thestate Moreover compared with maps drawn by private person maps drawn by official organizationopposite party or neutral agencies are likely to have higher evidential value than those drawn to advanceparticular claims or expressing a personal opinion This paper reviews Diaoyu Dao and its affiliated islandson six maps of China drawn by western cartographers before 1885 which were not been mentioned inprevious study It is shown that all these maps used Chinese names for Diaoyu Dao and its affiliated islandsand colored Diaoyu Dao Huangwei Yu Chiwei Yu and the Taiwan Island as the same Withconsideration of cartographers background according to the criteria of dispute settlement body ofconcerning value of justice evidence it concludes that Diaoyu Dao and its affiliated islands had been apart of China before the SinoJapanese War

关 键 词：钓鱼岛 地图 领土主权 证据 

分 类 号：D829.13[政治法律—政治学]