主动蓄放热加热基质与加热空气温室增温效果对比  

Warming effect comparison between substrate warming system and air warming system by active heat storage-release in Chinese solar greenhouse

作　　者：柯行林 杨其长[1,2] 张义[1,2] 方慧[1,2] 和永康 张晨 

机构地区：[1]中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所,北京100081 [2]农业部设施农业节能与废弃物处理重点实验室,北京100081

出　　处：《农业工程学报》2017年第22期224-232,共9页Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering

基　　金：863计划课题(2013AA102407);自然科学基金项目(51508560);基本科研业务费(BSRF201605)

摘　　要：为进一步提高日光温室内主动蓄放热热能的利用效率,该文以主动蓄放热加热基质系统(active heat storage-release substrate warming system,AHSSWS)提升栽培基质温度作为试验组,以主动蓄放热加热空气系统(active heat storage-release air warming system,AHSAWS)提升夜间气温处理作为对照组,比较了2种加温方式对基质温度、室内气温及番茄生长、产量的影响,并对2个系统的能量收支情况、设备投入、运行成本进行了比较。试验结果表明,相比主动蓄放热加热空气系统,主动蓄放热加热基质系统可提高基质温度2.5~5.3℃;与加热空气相比,加热基质处理可提高番茄株高及产量(增产43%)。连续晴天情况下,主动蓄放热加热基质系统的COP(coefficient of performance)为1.5~1.9,主动蓄放热加热空气系统的COP为3.0~4.0;连续阴天情况下,主动蓄放热加热基质系统的COP为0.5~0.9,主动蓄放热加热空气系统的COP为1.0~2.2。相对于主动蓄放热加热空气系统,主动蓄放热加热基质系统的集热效率、节能率、平均COP略低;但试验组的单位产量耗能量为0.7 k J/kg,低于对照组的单位产量耗能量(1.0 k J/kg),从单产能耗角度来讲,主动蓄放热加热基质系统更具优势,因此可根据番茄销售价格及当地电价来选择相应的加温系统。该文研究结果为主动蓄放热热能的高效利用以及主动蓄放热加热基质系统在日光温室冬春季番茄加温栽培应用提供了理论依据。In order to improve the utilization efficiency of the heat from active heat storage-release system in Chinese solar greenhouses, the solar energy can be utilized to improve the temperature of the substrate. Based on the active heat storage-release system, we designed the active heat storage-release substrate warming system （AHSSWS） in order to provide theoretical basis for multiple applications of the active heat storage-release system. The AHSSWS was composed of active heat storage-release plates, water tank, heating pipes under substrate bags and submersible pump. In the daytime, when the water circuited in the system, the solar radiation and thermal energy in the air were absorbed. Then the heat would be released to the substrate in the soil through the heating pipes embedded. The experiment was conducted from December 16, 2016 to February 16, 2017. Tomato was used as the model plant in the greenhouse. The AHSSWS was compared with the active heat storage-release air warming system （AHSAWS） in order to find out which was better to lower the heat consumption for unit production. Effects of 2 heating approaches on the substrate temperature, air temperature indoor, plant height and stem diameter of tomato on different dates and tomato yield were contradistinguished. Moreover, collected and released heat, COP （coefficient of performance）, power consumption and facility investment of 2 systems under diverse weather conditions were analyzed and compared. The results showed that compared with AHSAWS, AHSSWS designed could increase the substrate temperature by 2.5-5.3 , but there was not obvious difference on air warming. Compared with air heating, substrate heating ℃treatment could significantly increase the height, fresh weight and dry weight of tomato plant. In the case of continuous sunny days, the COP of AHSSWS was 1.5-1.9 and that of AHSAWS was 3.0-4.0. In the case of continuous cloudy days, the COP of AHSSWS was 0.5-0.9 and that of AHSAWS was 1.0-2.2. The difference between water te

关 键 词：温室 温度 加温 番茄 加热设备 基质 蓄热 

分 类 号：S625.4[农业科学—园艺学]