检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨正万[1]
机构地区:[1]贵州民族大学法制与民族地区发展研究中心,贵州贵阳550025
出 处:《铜仁学院学报》2017年第11期80-83,共4页Journal of Tongren University
摘 要:乡村治理虽然已经有自治、德治、法治构成的治理体系,但是,乡村治理中的法治方式并没有占据治理方式中的主导地位。此外,乡村治理中的法治方式作用也不十分明显,与应有的状态还存在较大差距。乡村治理中法治方式对乡村治理中的自治方式和德治方式具有保障作用。乡村治理中的法治方式边缘化现象还未改观,明确法治方式在上述三种方式中的地位和功能显得很有必要。因此,在乡村治理中从工作机制层面,推动法治方式发挥作用是有效解决乡村问题的措施之一。The self-rule, the rule by law and the rule by virtue constitute the rural governance system, among which, the rule by law doesn’t occupy a dominant position nor have a distinct impact on the rural governance. There still exists a big gap between its role and the practical condition. Although the rule by law plays a role to guarantee the self-rule and the rule by virtue in the rural governance, yet its role is marginalized, which hasn’t been improved so far. Therefore, the confirmation of its position and function among the three rules is quite necessary and one of the most effective countermeasures is to give its full play in the rural governance from the perspective of the practical working system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166