从编辑学视角考察一段草书史资料以讹传讹的引用  

An Investigation into the Spread of the False Quotation of a Cursive History Datum from the Perspective of Editing

作　　者：李应青[1] 

机构地区：[1]<滁州学院学报>编辑部,滁州239000

出　　处：《出版科学》2017年第6期42-45,共4页Publishing Journal

基　　金：安徽省高校人文社科重点研究基地项目"江淮分水岭区域文化精神特质研究"(SK2016A066);"宋元以降江淮分水岭地区多元共治研究"(SK2017A0420)研究成果

摘　　要：北宋张载曾有一段关于草书的论述,后被郭沫若、沙孟海及诸多著作者误认为南宋张栻所言。本文从编辑学的角度考察造成这种以讹传讹的原因,并从编辑实践意义上概括在引文运用上需要注意的四个方面的教训。Zhang Zai, a famous scholar of Northem Song Dynasty, ever made a discussion about cursive script which was later mistaken for the opinion of Zhang Shi, a scholar of Southern Song Dynasty, by Guo Moruo, Sha Menghai, and other experts. The article has explored the causes of this erroneous message from the perspective of redactology, and summarized four pieces of valuable instructions for citations on the basis of editing practice.

关 键 词：草书 张载 张栻 引文 

分 类 号：G232[文化科学]