检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆师范大学经济与管理学院,重庆401331
出 处:《重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2017年第6期127-135,共9页Journal of Chongqing Normal University:Natural Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金(No.14AJL015;No.13XMZ085);重庆市教委人文社会科学重点项目(No.14SKE02);重庆市教委人文社会科学重点项目(No.2013PYYJ11);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(No.CYS17180);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(No.CYB14003);国家旅游局研究型英才培养项目(No.WMYC20151128)
摘 要:【目的】为了论证中国制造业技术引进与创新增长之间的关系:促进还是抑制?【方法】基于2004—2014年中国30个省(直辖市、自治区)的制造业面板数据,应用柯布-道格拉斯(C-D)生产函数形式的随机前沿模型进行研究,但鉴于随机前沿法存在的缺陷,将选择恰当的生产函数形式和适当的技术无效模型形式,引入劳动与资本的交叉项和二次项,并运用相关理论进行严格的检验;【结果】构建了超越对数随机前沿模型,实证考察了国内技术购买和国外技术引进这两种技术引进来源对中国制造业技术进步效率的影响。【结论】研究发现,就全国整体而言,国内技术购买与国外技术引进对制造业技术进步效率具有显著的正向促进效应,但这种效应在东部地区、中部地区和西部地区呈现出显著差异,国内、外技术引进对制造业创新效率的促进效应,西部地区最为显著、东部地区为正但不显著、中部地区显著为负。政府R&D投入、外商直接投资无论是全国层面还是区域层面对制造业技术进步效率都有正向促进作用。[Purposes]To demonstrate the relationship between technology import and innovation growth in China's manufacturing industry:promotion or inhibition?[Methods]Based on the 2004-2014 China 30 provinces(municipalities and autonomous regions)panel data of manufacturing industry,the application of Cobb Douglas(C-D)model of stochastic frontier production function,but in view of the defects of stochastic frontier method,will choose the appropriate form of production function and appropriate technical inefficiency model the introduction of labor and capital,the cross term and two items,and strict inspection by the relevant theory;[Findings]It constructed translog stochastic frontier model,investigated the influence of domestic and foreign technology purchase technology which introduced these two kinds of technology import source of Chinese manufacturing technical progress efficiency.[Conclusions]The study found that,on the whole country,the domestic purchase of technology and the introduction of foreign technology to the manufacturing industry technological progress efficiency has remarkable positive effect,but the effect in the eastern region,central region and the western region showed significant difference,the domestic and foreign technology promoting effect on manufacturing innovation efficiency,the most significantly,the eastern region is positive but not significant,the central region is significantly negative.Government RD investment and foreign direct investment(FDI)both in the national level and regional level have positive effects on the technological progress efficiency of the manufacturing industry.
分 类 号:F415.2[经济管理—产业经济] TH16[机械工程—机械制造及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117