检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘涛[1]
出 处:《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2017年第4期70-75,共6页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
摘 要:国家监察体制改革使得检察机关查处贪污贿赂、失职渎职以及预防职务犯罪等职能被剥离出去,检察权将重新面临宪法上的重新定位。从历史和现实、国内和国外检察制度的发展状况看,我国检察权的基本内涵应当包括:公诉权和诉讼监督权。其中,公诉权是检察权的本质权能,是监察体制改革背景下检察权能转型的核心。在具体调整策略上,检察权能应着重探索和发展公益诉讼制度、确定适度的起诉自由裁量权、选择合适的诉讼监督模式、拓展诉讼监督的线索渠道以及强化刑罚执行监督等,从而更好地服务于司法公正。The state supervision system reform makes the prosecution to investigate corruption and bribery, dereliction of duty and the prevention of duty crime and other functions were stripped out, the prosecution will reface the constitutional repositioning. From the historical and real, domestic and foreign prosecutorial system development situation, the basic connotation of our procuratorial power should include: the right of public prosecution and litigation supervision. Among them, the right of public prosecution is the essence of procuratorial power, is to monitor the reform of the system under the background of the core of the power of prosecution. In the specific adjustment strategy, the procuratorial power should focus on the exploration and development of public interest litigation system, to determine the appropriate prosecution discretion, select the appropriate mode of litigation supervision, to expand the clues to litigation supervision and strengthen the implementation of supervision, so as to better serve in justice.
分 类 号:DF214[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.52