检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴志俊[1] 张芳芳[1] 邹林兵[1] 汪凌云[1] 张奕[1] 王静雅[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽省妇幼保健院,安徽医科大学附属妇幼保健院生殖医学中心,合肥230001
出 处:《中国性科学》2017年第11期106-108,共3页Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
基 金:安徽省合肥市医学重点专科建设计划资助项目
摘 要:目的:分析辅助生殖技术对新生儿性别比例的影响。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2016年1月在我院生殖医学中心经辅助生殖技术助孕新生儿总数495人,根据周期类型和移植胚胎发育阶段分别两两比较新生儿性别比例。结果:所有新生儿中男性253人,女性242人,新生儿中男性比例复苏周期高于新鲜周期(52.45%vs.48.52%,P=0.406),囊胚高于卵裂期胚胎(56.69%vs.48.52%,P=0.091),但均无统计学差异。结论:不同辅助生殖技术方法不影响新生儿性别比例。Objectives: To analysis the effect of assisted reproductive technology on newborn sex ratio.Methods: Retrospective analysis on 495 newborns by assisted reproductive technology at the Center for Reproductive Medicine of Anhui Maternal and Children Health Care Hospital from January 2014 to January 2016 was done. The sex ratio was analyzed according to different type of cycle and stage of embryo transferred. Results: The newborns included 253 male and 242 female babies. The male ratio of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle was higher than that of fresh embryo transfer cycle( 52. 45% VS 48. 52%,P = 0. 406) and male ratio of blastophere was higher than that of cleavage stage embryo( 56. 69% VS 48. 52%,P = 0. 091),but there was no difference( P〈0. 05).Conclusion: Different methods of assisted reproductive technology do not affect the newborn sex ratio.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38