检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨宇虹 刘卫红 Yang Yuhong Liu Weihong(College of Humanities and Law, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, 050043, Chin)
机构地区:[1]石家庄铁道大学文法学院,河北石家庄050043
出 处:《石家庄铁道大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第4期71-75,共5页Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家铁路局科技与法制司课题:"铁路运输营业活动中公众权益保护研究"
摘 要:列车站坐票同价问题是铁路运输中公众利益保护的重要问题,支付相同对价却不能享受同等的服务,与合同的自由平等原则相悖,与契约精神相悖。虽然铁路运输行业有其特殊性,但其特殊性不足以牺牲公众利益为代价,因此,文章从理论上厘清列车站坐票同价问题的实质及危害,并提出解决对策。解决站坐票同价问题,应当调整火车票价实现站坐票差异化对待,同时引入社会资本提高铁路运力逐步取消无座票,重视对个案的公正判决加强司法正确引导,以实现铁路旅客运输合同的自由性和正义性。Railway corporations sell standing tickets when passengers' volume booms in order to relieve the pressure of railway traffic. Thus it can meet the need of leaping passenger transportation. But selling standing tickets at the same price as sitting tickets not only harms passengers' economic interests, but also violates the principles of contract freedom and justice. In the long run, it isn't beneficial for sustainable and healthy development of railway corporations. Also, it obstructs the way of setting up a free and fair market. It is necessary to adjust the price of train ticket, make correctly judicial guidance, attract social capital in railway business and push the railway transport enterprises to solve the problem.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.194.168