检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院
出 处:《天津师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第6期7-13,54,共8页Journal of Tianjin Normal University(Social Science)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(15ZDA003);国家社会科学基金项目(13BZZ014)
摘 要:在后发国家的政治发展进程中,显现出不同政体下政府绩效与政治合法性之间关系模式的多样化。东欧、东南亚等国的政治进程表明:良好的政府绩效是政权政治合法性的基础,有利于民主或威权政体的稳固。智利、韩国等20世纪60年代以来在经济繁荣基础上发生政治转型,以及印度等贫穷"民主"国家的长期存续,是政府绩效助益或削弱政体政治合法性的不同案例。后发国家政府绩效体现在经济绩效、社会分配、民众心理预期等方面,对政权的政治合法性有重要影响,也因此引发一些国家政权的合法性危机和发展困境。In the process of political development in late developing countries,it appears diversified relation modes between government performance and political legitimacy in different regimes. The political process in Eastern Europe and South East Asian countries indicate that good government performance is the base of political power legitimacy and in favor of the consolidation of democracy or authoritarian polity. Since 1960 s,It happens political transformation based on their prosperous economy in Chile and South Korean,etc.,and the long-term survival of poverty "democratic" countries such as India,etc.,which present different cases that government performance benefits or weakens regime political legitimacy. Thereare four dimensions of government performance in late developing countries:economic performance,social distribution,the public expectations and so on,which have important influence on political legitimacy for polity,and also provoke legitimacy crisis and development predicament in some countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229