美欧个人信息保护制度的比较与分析  

A Comparative Analysis of Personal Information Protection Systems in U.S. and E.U.

作　　者：张薇 池建新[2] 

机构地区：[1]南京审计大学文学院,江苏南京211815 [2]南京师范大学外国语学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《情报科学》2017年第12期115-119,128,共6页Information Science

基　　金：2014年国家社科基金一般项目(14BTQ048)

摘　　要：【目的/意义】现行制度在对公民个人信息的全面有效保护方面存在着诸多漏洞,无论理论还是实践都有必要借鉴信息社会先进的国家或地区的相关制度。【方法/过程】本文主要通过运用模式比较法,分析美、欧在保障个人信息安全方面的异同,探索保护和利用个人信息资源应有的理念和原则。【结果/结论】美国的隐私权保护和欧盟重视个人信息自决权及我国宪法规定的保障人格权在本质上有相通的一面,与统一立法还是分散立法相比,我国应建立结合自身国情、接轨国际标准规范、参考各主要国家立法实践的个人信息安全保护制度体系。[Purpose/significance]There are many loopholes in China＇s existing system on protecting personal information fully and effectively. Therefore, both theoretically and practically, it is necessary to learn from the information system of ad- vanced countries or regions. [ Method/process ] This article mainly uses the model comparison to analyze the similarities and differences of personal information protection in U.S. and E.U., in order to explore the concept and principles of protecting personal information. [ Result/conclusion] In essence, there are some aspects in common about the privacy protection in U. S., the self-determination right of personal information in E.U., and the protection of personality under the constitution of our country. Compared with unified legislation or decentralized legislation, China should establish personal information pro- tection system based on its own national conditions, the international standards, and the legislative practice of major nations in the world.

关 键 词：个人信息 个人信息管理 欧盟指令 美国 欧盟 

分 类 号：G203[文化科学—传播学] D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]