检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓凤平[1]
机构地区:[1]四川省林业中心医院血透室,四川成都610081
出 处:《结直肠肛门外科》2017年第5期666-669,共4页Journal of Colorectal & Anal Surgery
摘 要:目的研究品管圈(quality control circle,QCC)活动对血液透析后慢性功能性便秘患者的影响。方法选取本院2012年8月至2016年2月68例血液透析后慢性功能性便秘患者为研究对象,根据QCC实施前后分为观察组(n=34)与对照组(n=34),比较两组1 w平均排便次数、每次排便平均时间、大便情况积分及护理前后生活质量问卷评分。结果观察组护理后1 w排便次数多于对照组(P<0.05),观察组大便情况积分低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组护理后生活质量问卷评分中躯体症状、挫折得分及总分与对照组比较显著提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论品管圈活动可增加血液透析后慢性功能性便秘患者的排便次数及排便效果,改善患者生活质量。Objective To study the clinical effect of quality control circle(QCC) in patients with chronic functional constipation after hemodialysis. Methods Sixty-eight patients with chronic functional constipation after hemodialysis were recruited from March 2014 to February 2016 and from August 2012 to February 2014 in our hospital as study subjects. According to the time of implementation of QCC,patients were divided into treatment group(n = 34) and control group(n = 34). The average defecation frequency in 1 week,average time of defecation,stool score and quality of life questionnaire scores before and after nursing were compared between the two groups. Results The defecation frequency in 1 week after nursing was higher in the treatment group than in the control group(P〈0.05). The scores of defecation in treatment group were lower than that in control group(P〈0.05). After nursing,physical symptoms,frustration and total scores in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion QCC can increase frequency and quality of defecation and improve quality of life in patients with chronic functional constipation after hemodialysis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222