“血统论”在东亚历史解释中的实践及其困局  

The Practice and Dilemma of “Blood Theory” in the Historical Interpretation of East Asia

作　　者：苗威[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学历史文化学院,吉林长春130024

出　　处：《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第6期117-122,共6页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(15ZDB063);国家社会科学基金委托项目(15@ZH007);东北师范大学重点培育项目(15ZD009)

摘　　要：在东亚生态文明史的阐释中,古代各民族乃至政权,被连结成为一个脉息相通和损益攸关的生命共同体。然而,不同视角下的解释却往往是对这一共同体的肢解。基于"血统"而引发的相关论述惑乱严重,只有突破"血统论"的偏狭,才能客观揭示东亚的历史真相,并给现实的东亚,提供有益的思考。In the interpretation of the history of ecological civilization in East Asia,not only ancient peoples but also regimes were linked into a life chain of interest and profit and loss.However,the interpretation under different perspectives was often the dismemberment of this community.The relevant discussion based on the＂blood theory＂caused serious confusion.Only if breaking the narrow of＂blood theory＂,could objectively reveal the historical truth of East Asia and provide useful thinking to the reality of East Asia.

关 键 词：“血统论” 东亚 历史 

分 类 号：K242[历史地理—历史学] K312.1[历史地理—中国史]